Thursday, July 25, 2024

Power struggle continues in South Korea



Saw one South Korean analysis yesterday that ended up focusing on the Constitutional Court in South Korea "packed" with Yoon appointees. Yoon also in effective control over the executive blocking any impartial investigation of himself or his spouse due to his historical relationship with the Public Prosecutors Offices and in addition to that his record routine use of veto powers, is an authoritarian ruler. The majority opposition party in the National Assembly has been unable to appoint an independent prosecutor to take on Yoon and his wife to set the stage for impeachment. Otherwise, expect 3 more years of Yoondoom. (Yoon's rule is damaging the conservative party as demonstrated by the last general election.) Even if the opposition democrats could overcome Yoon's veto, and ultimately be on the road to impeachment, the conservative Constitutional Court packed by Yoon would probably find impeachment not to be warranted.

One fly in the ointment for Yoon is his party's election this week of Han Dong-hun, former prosecutor and former Minister of Justice, as the new PPP conservative party leader. Han received a convincing 62.8* percent of rank and file party votes. Just as there is no trust among thieves, this performance by Han puts him in line for a later run as a presidential contender. Han in the past, served as Yoon's loyal henchman, and was also close to the First Lady Kim Gon-hee. Now, Han's loyalty to Yoon is no longer an asset but a liability to his ambition.

(Source- 뉴스썰TV, 4.27.2020) Supreme Prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol (right) greeting prosecutor Han Dong-hun, (far left). The latter is suspected by political opponents of being the source of an unlawful relationship with the press to arrange for political motivated indictments.


The opposition democratic majority party technically only needs 8 votes to defect from Han's party to override Yoon's vetoes of independent prosecutor legislation designed to set Yoon up for an impeachment. Such a vote would likely put Han and whatever followers he now may have in the prosecutors offices in a position to place Han as a presidential candidate sooner rather than later.

Then Han's clique could refocus and continue their prosecutions of Lee Jae-myung, Cho Guk, and other potential presidential contenders to remove them from the field as Han and Yoon had been doing for years. Han could, by making a deal with the opposition party, enable them to override any presidential veto and thereafter secure enough votes for impeachment. If the Constitutional Court understood that Han was the rising star in the conservative political world, it could possibly be moved by "noon chi" perception of the best interests of the conservative vested "corrupt special interests," to get rid of Yoon to facilitate Han's rise to power. In other words the Constitutional Court could change its direction long enough to get rid of Yoon and empower Han to be his replacement after an early election. To set this up, Han might have to deliver maybe 18 votes to overcome Yoon's veto, because the opposition democratic party has probably around 10 defectors (DINO's) in its ranks that won't vote for anything Lee Jae-myung wants to do.


*Updated this number based on late reports 7.26 00:45 est.


Monday, July 15, 2024

Balancing the US anti-China perspective



A wounded Donald Trump and protecting Secret Service officers caught by photographers in an "Iwo Jima" like posture with the American flag.


Well, the new pro-Trump T-shirts and flags are out. The flags are already up in my neighborhood. We're living now in "Trump Nation." Biden nation has been no picnic as his administration and Congress are addicted to promoting war and a Social Darwinist (fascist) foreign policy. WWIII could break out at any time. Trump's election seems all but assured, as the heroic imagery of his defiance in the face of his putative killer(s) has been openly compared to the heroic WWII scene at Iwo-jima. This image appearing on a NY Post front page is ironic in the extreme because Trump's anti-China policies are more than likely to be in America's and even NATO's future. Yet, as James Bradley, the son of the one of the US Marines who participated in the iconic scene raising the flag at Iwo Jima, points out so well in his book, The China Image, the Hidden History of American Disaster in Asia, US perceptions of China (and Asia in general) are largely delusional.

The US anti-Chinese perspective is bi-partisan and the racist imperialism on which it is based, is second nature. The problem as many see it, is that Biden has dissipated the anti-China gestalt by becoming embroiled in a fruitless war against Russia in Ukraine.

ECONOMIC WAR: NATO Threatens to Nationalize Assets Owned by China Lena Petrova, 9 min

I watched Brian Berletic's video on the China- Philippines South China Sea dispute, a couple of days ago. The video is based on his own article at Near Eastern Outlook. This is a description of his article that he posted on his youtube channel-

"Does starting a war over a grounded WW2 ship on a submerged shoal with its largest trade partner serve the Philippines’ best interests? Or does it serve Washington’s interests at the expense of the Philippines? The SCMP article already illustrated how badly needed public infrastructure has literally been torn down in exchange for escalating tensions with the Philippines’ largest trade partner, China.

One needs not guess where this will lead the Philippines if it continues to serve US interests by escalating tensions with China because the same process is already well underway in Ukraine."

The Philippines: Why it is Choosing US Destruction Over Chinese Construction


Maritime disputes treated as minor bilateral concerns to be worked out with Beijing under President Duterte, were escalated into a growing conflict under President Marcos Jr. with US backing, meant to serve as the very pretext to cancel and literally tear down joint Chinese-Philippine projects and replace it with the expansion of the US military’s footprint across the Philippines.


Brian's related 37 minute video based on his article-

The Philippines: Why it is Choosing US Destruction Over Chinese Construction


Below- Historical and legal arguments on the South China Sea dispute from the Chinese perspective. CGTN 30 minute.




Sovereignty at Stake: A documentary on the South China Sea dispute





Elsewhere on this same Japanese politics thread, it was noted that a new right wing meme in Japanese social media says Abe told Trump to turn his head. The imagery of Biden and the Greater East Asian Co-prosperity Sphere is no joke, but reflects the reality of the US Japanese alliance. It is always assumed that Japan is the subordinate power being forced to follow the US lead. This is a convenient cover for LDP right wing national policy of rearmament and becoming "great again."

Note- amended this 7.15 at 17:50 to include image of Trump.